www.philosophiaupjp2.fora.pl

cheapbag214s

-- for these lawyers to claim a role in policy-making for which they werenot appointed or elected, for which they are not fitted by experience, and forwhich they are not accountable.As best I can see, the only purpose of thislitigation is for counsel and plaintiffs to act out their fantasy ofpersecution,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], to validate their pretensions to policy expertise, to makethemselves consequential rather than marginal, and to raise funds forself-sustaining litigation. In short,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], Counsel's and Plaintiffs' onlyperceptible interest is to carve out for themselves an influence overgovernment policy -- an interest that the law of standing forecloses.Fighting words! What in the world had the lawyers and clients done to earn the wrath of the decorated appointee of George H.W. Bush? What in the world was the case about? Treason and treachery, no doubt. Alas, no. The case was (and is) about something very sober and important. Here's how 2nd Circuit Judge Gerald Lynch put it in the first paragraph of his opinion, explaining why the federal